Get breaking business news on WhatsApp
The High Court has ruled that President William Ruto’s announcements giving teachers and police officers priority in affordable housing allocation have no legal effect, because allocation must follow the Affordable Housing Act and its regulations, Capital FM reported on October 29, 2026.
What the court decided
Justice Patricia Nyaundi Mande found that announcements made on June 3 and September 13, 2025, which proposed reserving 20% of affordable housing units for teachers and police officers, were not backed by legislation or an established policy framework. The court declared that the announcements cannot lawfully change or add to the existing allocation criteria.
“Executive authority may facilitate the implementation of the law, but it cannot alter the law or create rights and preferences outside it,” the judge said. She added that the President’s powers under Article 132 of the Constitution do not allow the Executive to override laws passed by Parliament.
Who brought the case
The petition was filed by John Maina Ndegwa, Marshalls Tito Ongoya and two others. They argued that every Kenyan has an equal right to housing under Article 43 of the Constitution and that giving selected professions priority needed a lawful basis. The court noted that the respondents and interested parties conceded the announcements had no legal effect because the law already governs allocation.
What it means for affordable housing applicants
| Question | Answer after the ruling |
|---|---|
| Is there a 20% quota for teachers and police? | No, not on the basis of the presidential announcements |
| What rules apply? | The Affordable Housing Act and its regulations |
| Can teachers and police still apply? | Yes, on the same criteria as other applicants |
| Could a priority quota come back? | Only through legislation or regulations made under the law |
Applicants register and apply through the Boma Yangu platform. If you are unsure how the programme works, our guide explains Boma Yangu vs the Affordable Housing Programme. The programme is funded partly by the housing levy deducted from salaries; see the affordable housing levy rate and payroll impact.
Why the ruling matters beyond housing
The decision restates a broader principle: policy announced at public events must be backed by law before it changes people’s rights. For the housing programme, it means allocations should be predictable and based on published criteria, which matters to the millions of workers paying the levy. Developers and investors in the programme also benefit from clear rules.
What happens next
The government could appeal, or seek to amend the regulations through the proper process, which would require public participation and parliamentary scrutiny. No appeal had been reported as of October 31, 2026.
FAQ
Did the court stop teachers and police from getting affordable houses?
No. It ruled they cannot get priority through presidential announcements; they can apply under the normal criteria.
Which judge made the ruling?
Justice Patricia Nyaundi Mande of the High Court.
What law governs allocation?
The Affordable Housing Act and its regulations.
Updated October 31, 2026.
Prefer WhatsApp? Follow Business Radar on WhatsApp
Weekly, free. We only use your email for this newsletter and you can unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.
